I read about Geo-engineering in Scientific American magazine some 15 years ago. What I remember about that article is a concept of putting Iron oxide in the oceans to promote plankton growth there by sequestrating carbon into the deep ocean. What is cool about this idea it promotes green growth a natural process that promotes life. Sort of a win win solution.
What we have instead is areal spraying of Aluminum oxide Strontium and Barium high in the atmosphere. Otherwise known as chem-trails. Basically the idea is to put highly reflective particles to bounce the sun rays away from hitting the ocean or ground cutting down the amount of sun shine the plants get. Plants as you know takes carbon dioxide converts the carbon in to fiber and releases oxygen back into the ecosystem. So basically this geo-engineering is not in balance with life it is eliminating the needed energy6 that the plant needs to do its process of converting CO2 into life giving oxygen. I would say though I can not prove that what ever benefit gained it cutting back the heat would also effect the carbon sequestering that plant and trees do.
I know that my logic is good here but I will admit I do not have the data to prove that what they are doing is not doing what they say it is doing . But I have a second point to say that this method is not viable and that is the pollutants that they are using are harmful to life. Aluminum is linked to dementia the other element mentioned do not sound to me like things we should be breathing.
If you agree with my postulate I urge you to contact your representative or senator and let them know you do not like the logic the are using for Geo-engineering spraying nasty chemicals in our atmosphere to slow down plant and tree growth and polluting the air we breathe. Let us do things that support life not against it.
I would also like to add that you can have some success with using oregone cloud busters, I use a pyramid shaped oergone device it works pretty sell to dispel the chem trails.